<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
On 7/4/2018 4:29 PM, Paul Allen wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPy1dOKPUqH4bTapv4Hurm7SsPCPupr8c1QpTa675VndJ=r-mQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>Seems OK to me. They're selling after-life insurance.
Pay your tithe or put money on the collection plate and
you<br>
</div>
<div>go to heaven. And there's a money-back guarantee: if
you don't go to heaven, or there's no afterlife at all,
simply<br>
</div>
<div>return and make a complaint and they'll give you your
money back. They've never had to pay up under that<br>
</div>
<div>guarantee in the thousands of years they've been
operating. That shows how good they are.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
So, access=saps?<br>
<br>
This reminds me of something I've been meaning to ask the list...
I've got a lot of psychics in the area. I've been tagging them
shop=psychic because that's what the signs say, but I don't really
feel OSM ought to be endorsing unverifiable claims of supernatural
power. shop=charlatan seems a little judgemental. So I was
considering changing them to shop=fortune_teller. I think this will
cover psychics, palmists, tea-leafists, tarot readers, etc. What do
people think?<br>
<br>
J<br>
</body>
</html>