<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17/07/18 08:36, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP4zaXrLM6RFDQxh8Wj5bvxzYqZ5b_zw+e1HBS+EEGJVPyvWmA@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div>
<div class="gmail_signature"
data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>On 17 July 2018 at 06:31, Alan Grant <span
dir="ltr"><<a
href="mailto:alangrant72@gmail.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">alangrant72@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">But why do these discussions/controversies/<wbr>ambiguities
matter for golf courses? Are we talking about how to tag
areas of tree cover that may exist between the fairways
and greens? </div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>No, I mentioned it because the golf course in question
is "built" entirely inside the boundaries of an area
designated as "State Forest", which is intended for
logging purposes, so it renders on OSM as a light green
patch entirely covered by trees. Don't know what will
happen if I then map tree rows, bunkers, water hazards
& so on - guess we'll have a small patch of blue with
trees in it as well?</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I think the area cannot be used for logging. There is a saw mill in
the Tumut NSW Australia area (Batlow IIRC?) operated by the Forestry
Commission, designated as a state forest .. yet it is correctly
tagged as land use industrial in OSM. I would think the same applies
to the golf course - map what is there, not necessarily the official
designation ... it could be out of date, what ever the case what is
on the ground should override any other source of information. <br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP4zaXrLM6RFDQxh8Wj5bvxzYqZ5b_zw+e1HBS+EEGJVPyvWmA@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div class="h5">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Mon, Jul
16, 2018 at 3:46 PM Mateusz Konieczny<br>
<<a
href="mailto:matkoniecz@tutanota.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">matkoniecz@tutanota.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
> landuse=forest in OSM is for
tree-covered area, not for area used for
logging-related purposes<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>But doesn't the wiki say that landuse=forest is for
managed forests, intended for logging purposes (or similar
wording - can't open it ATM for some reason?), which this
entire area is?</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<!--'"--></blockquote>
<br>
Apparently areas used for logging-related purposes are not to be
mapped in OSM .. there are no tags available for this land use. <br>
We simply cannot map them. <br>
</body>
</html>