<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 20/07/18 05:45, François Lacombe
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAG0ygLc0xRyxtRDXsJFZKFxfUTUuE7Lo7jnWHQf-x7_4Jg7Xsg@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Hi <br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">2018-07-19 2:17 GMT+02:00 Warin <span
dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><span class=""><br>
</span> That does not allow for a combination .. e.g.<br>
<br>
seasonal presence in winter<br>
intermittent presence in spring;summer <br>
<br>
The present practice of adding the tag intermittent to
anything tagged seasonal does not help at all for any
chance of combinations ... so OSM may as well abandon
any hope of detailing any complex situation.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I think this is too variable, and then OSM isn't the
best place to put kind of waterflow timeserie.</div>
<div>water_permanance=intermittent should also reflect
that water may be there occasionally without any fixed
pattern.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
water_permanence=seasonal ... would loose the specific season
unless there is an added sub tag of seasonal=winter ... <br>
or if could be tagged <br>
<p>water_permanence=winter directly. I think that is better. <br>
</p>
<p>Any further ideas on a tagging proposal of
water_permanence=intermittent/seasonal/winter/summer/spring/autumn/ephemeral/* </p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>