<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>"assigned with a specific role" is probably the best
interpretation for example "this is a designated disabled parking
area" would mean the specific role is parking for disabled people.
the preferred model does seem to be tagging access=no then the
exceptions from what i can tell. there probably should be more
templates really to aid in this, but then again if you don't
define the access tag and the only thing there is
access:disabled=designated.... i guess it's the same idea. also i
saw some cases of access:disabled=customers? wouldn't
access=customers paired with access:disabled=designated be a good
pairing? it's just then a question of how we also specify the no
tag in the neatest way possible or if we omit it in that scenario<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/16/18 23:06, Jo wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAJ6DwMByG2_dHK546qYzsdYOsC5M2kzUF4iDoZt0NbfEtzzyUg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr">you mean it must be tagged:
<div><br>
</div>
<div>access=no</div>
<div>+exceptions<br>
</div>
<div>?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>designated is an odd word. I started to understand it as
signposted as such, or clear from road markings.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>but it's not the meaning it has in designated driver, where
it means "assigned with a specific role/responsability"</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">Op do 16 aug. 2018 om 23:59 schreef Warin <<a
href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 17/08/18
07:46, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
><br>
> sent from a phone<br>
><br>
>> On 16. Aug 2018, at 23:35, seirra <<a
href="mailto:general@sarifria.x10.bz" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">general@sarifria.x10.bz</a>>
wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> should cases where yes was used be corrected to
designated? or should it be considered a stylistic choice?<br>
><br>
> generally, it doesn’t work very well, because you want to
express who can park there not who can access the lot. It
should be “only” or “designated” because yes does not exclude
others, while only does and designated tends to do.<br>
><br>
<br>
For OSM .. to exclude others it should it not be tagged<br>
<br>
access=no<br>
<br>
then<br>
<br>
disabled=yes/designated to accept disabled?<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>