<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>huh. I thought i read about it needing to be access:disabled...
however i feel like this should be quoted: "Nodes and areas tagged
with <tt dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"
style="background:#EEF;font-size:1em;line-height:1.6"><bdi
style="white-space:nowrap"><a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity"
title="Key:amenity">amenity</a></bdi>=<a class="mw-selflink
selflink"><bdi>parking_space</bdi></a></tt> and <tt dir="ltr"
class="mw-content-ltr"
style="background:#EEF;font-size:1em;line-height:1.6"><bdi
style="white-space:nowrap"><a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:parking_space&action=edit&redlink=1"
class="new" title="Key:parking space (page does not exist)">parking_space</a></bdi>=<a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:parking_space%3Ddisabled&action=edit&redlink=1"
class="new" title="Tag:parking space=disabled (page does not
exist)"><bdi>disabled</bdi></a></tt> are rendered on <a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="http://rollstuhlkarte.ch/?zoom=15&lat=47.37&lon=8.54&layers=B00000FTFFFFFFFFT">rollstuhlkarte.ch</a>
(Wheelchair symbol with a small P in the top right corner; also
see <a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rollstuhlkarte.ch"
title="Rollstuhlkarte.ch">rollstuhlkarte.ch-Wikipage</a>)." and
upon inspection there are MANY, much more than the use of
access:disabled, or even disabled! is parking_space even a valid
tag though?(i can't see any documentation) because this seems to
be the only example of actual rendering, should we first see if we
can get the developers to transition to rendering the disabled tag
before we change it?<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/17/18 00:11, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:2447EF64-A0BD-46C7-94A4-F18C80C6BE33@gmail.com">
<pre wrap="">
sent from a phone
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 17. Aug 2018, at 00:19, seirra <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:general@sarifria.x10.bz"><general@sarifria.x10.bz></a> wrote:
also i saw some cases of access:disabled=customers? wouldn't access=customers paired with access:disabled=designated be a good pairing?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
actually the documented tag is
“disabled=*” and it has more than double the usage than “access:disabled=*”
capacity:disabled=* ist by far (30 times) more used than either of these.
Semantically, for a parking access:disabled makes less sense, because access is about who can enter the polygon ;-) For a road it could be beneficial to prefix “access” because it removes any ambiguity.
cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>