<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 21/09/18 23:16, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:LMwGaXO--7-1@tutanota.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div>I am not sure why landcover=clearing is described as better
than other.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If someone wants to leave gixme, the fixme key or OSM note is
the best solution. <br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Best solution for what?<br>
<br>
This started because a group wanted to map clearings from imagery. <br>
Why I don't know - they have not communicated despite attempts at
contact. <br>
They did not use a fixme etc by used something they thought
described what they were seeing in imagery. <br>
A fixme tries to contact locals to map the thing, as this group
wants things done in a hurry they don't use fixmes. <br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:LMwGaXO--7-1@tutanota.com">
<div><br>
</div>
6. Aug 2018 02:11 by <a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>:<br>
<p> </p>
<blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
#93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">and stop land
covers becoming regarded as a legitimate use of the key landuse.
<br>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>too late for that, see landuse=forest <br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
So landuse=sand<br>
landuse=dirt<br>
landuse=rock<br>
landuse=scrub<br>
landuse=valley<br>
landuse=peak<br>
landuse=cliff<br>
landuse=tunnel<br>
<br>
will all be fine to use? <br>
I don't think so. <br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>