<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
26. Sep 2018 06:32 by <a href="mailto:mark+osm@carnildo.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">mark+osm@carnildo.com</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:09:12 +0200<br />Florian Lohoff <<a href="mailto:f@zz.de" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">f@zz.de</a>> wrote:<br /><blockquote>On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:24:00AM -0700, Mark Wagner wrote:<br />> My point is that no such guarantee exists for roads without speed<br />> limit signs. Yes, the numeric limit for something like Glenwood<br />> Road might be 50 mph, but the road was designed around farm trucks<br />> going no more than 20 mph, and has the tight curves, short sight<br />> lines, and poor surface quality you'd expect for that speed. <br /><br />Sign posted speeds dont are not telling you "this is the speed which<br />is safe for 100% of the vehicles" but this is the maximum allowed. <br />You are still required to drive safely.</blockquote><br />That's not what I said. To repeat, my point is that, at least locally,<br />a signposted speed limit *is* a guarantee that, for an ordinary vehicle<br />traveling under ordinary conditions, the speed is reasonable. </blockquote><p><br /></p><p>Note that it is true in your region and it is not generally true.</p><p><br /></p><p>For example in Poland there are many places where signed <br /></p><p>speed limit is really low or really high compared to reasonable one.<br /></p> </body>
</html>