<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>This my pet use case for a site relation:<br>
<a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3161183#map=7/46.532/6.097">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3161183#map=7/46.532/6.097</a><br>
<br>
I'm not confortable to draw polygons around the ski pistes to then build a landuse=winter_sport multipolygon.<br>
Given the wildlife conservation rules in the area, I also doubt I can include the forest between pistes. <br>
Yves <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 2 octobre 2018 17:07:11 GMT+02:00, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz@tutanota.com> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
2. Październik 2018 12:36 od <a href="mailto:marc_marc_irc@hotmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">marc_marc_irc@hotmail.com</a>:<br><br><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">Le 02. 10. 18 à 11:46, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit :<br> > Can you link this case if that is more complicated?<br>it's a fictional example. ok not the better one.<br><br>take again the example you cut in the initial message:<br>a wind turbin site with a few turbines represented by a few nodes<br>I hope your solution is not to make a way for each wind turbine<br>to be able to add in into a multipolygon to describe the site.<br>it would not make much sense to make a polygon encompassing all objects <br>between the wind turbines and describe that the whole thing is a wind site</blockquote><p><br></p><p> I agree that for wind turbines multipolygon may not be feasible. </p><p><br></p><p>So far it is the only known to me case where site relation maybe is useful </p><p>(I have no experience with features like wind turbine farms so it is hard </p><p>for me to judge this case - that is why I skipped it).</p>
</blockquote></div></body></html>