<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/10/18 08:11, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP4zaXqXagRhpLgJb+y9-sLe1_8fssh1-CO9Xg+YHLiRNyU6CA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 06:49, Paul Allen <<a
href="mailto:pla16021@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true">pla16021@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I'd go with amenity=toy_library and the sub-tags,
or maybe not even bother with the sub-tags.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Not arguing!, but going back to my question about Family
History libraries, I wonder whether a lot of the confusion
about "what's in this "library"" wouldn't be sorted by the
name?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Assume for one moment that everything is tagged as
amenity=library, with sub-tags lending=yes, toys=no,
games=yes, family_history=no etc.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I can see that just the standard "book" library icon
showing would cause some confusion, but if this library is
named "Southport Public Library", while this one a bit
further down the road is "Fun & Games", then<i> I</i> at
least know which one I'm going to go into to to borrow some
books to read, & which one has games!</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Libraries I know have some 'family history' records have nothing in
their name to indicate that detail. <br>
</body>
</html>