<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
15. Oct 2018 10:57 by <a href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><div>1. amenity=artwork<br />Yes, tourism=artwork is the established tagging, but it has issues: artwork has nothing at all to do with tourism<br /></div></div></blockquote><p><br /></p><div>As I understand you - in your opinion it would be preferable to end with amenity=artwork as a <br /></div><div>preferred tagging.</div><div><br /></div><div>I am not sure how it changes that we ended with tourism-artwork as a standard.<br /></div><div><br /></div><p>Also, "has nothing at all" is not true. Artworks are quite likely to be a tourism attractions.<br /></p><p> </p><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><div>2. amenity=car_repair<br /></div><div>For businesses offering car repair, this isn't the right tag (shop is), but it doesn't mean there can't be an amenity=car_repair for place where you can repair your car.</div></div></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>Feel free to add that deprecation applies to businesses.</p><p>Though most of amenity=car_repair would be still businesses offering car repair, if you want to tag</p><p>something like that it would be preferable to find a new tag.<br /></p> </body>
</html>