<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
16. Oct 2018 09:47 by <a href="mailto:fl.infosreseaux@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">fl.infosreseaux@gmail.com</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><div><div><div><div class="gmail_quote">I'm still opposed to minor_line since in merge several different concept in one value, and is only useful for rendering</div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>power=line/power=minor_line is useful for both mappers and data users not <br /></p><p>interested in the extreme detail of power networks and care about them only as</p><p>orientation points or are mapping from aerial images.</p><p><br /></p><p>As usual, there people mapping in greater detail but both <br /></p><p><br /></p><p>"map it in general, without any special knowledge or interest in detail" and</p><p>and "map some detail" and "map it extreme detail" should be possible.</p><p><br /></p><p>power=line/power=minor_line is useful for the first use case.<br /></p><p><br /></p> </body>
</html>