<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 15.10.2018 um 16:38 schrieb Martin
Koppenhoefer:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CABPTjTBP=WR_p1An8uA-_7QiXrcvptO90HoYu7UfQGa7zg5f-w@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">Am Mo., 15. Okt. 2018 um 14:21 Uhr schrieb Tom
Pfeifer <<a href="mailto:t.pfeifer@computer.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">t.pfeifer@computer.org</a>>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On
15.10.2018 10:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
> 3. amenity=creche and amenity=nursery<br>
> For both tags amenity=kindergarten is suggested as
alternative tagging, which seems clearly wrong <br>
> (kindergarten is usually for ages 3-6 while these tags
are for ages 0-3). <br>
<br>
I thought the consensus was here that it depends on the
country. In Germany, I see mostly the "Kita" <br>
(Kindertagesstätte) structure which in the same institution
enrols age 0-6 in different departments <br>
or groups, and a lot offer afterschool supervision (Hort).<br>
This is easily expressed with the min_age + max_age tag, and
some folks use after_school=yes.</blockquote>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>For the German situation, KiTa and Hort should/could well
be tagged with childcare, but "Krippe"? And if we decide to
tag a Krippe (creche/nursery) the same as a Hort or KiTa, but
with age tags, isn't that inconsistent with Kindergarten? From
my point of view, Hort and KiTa are both childcare places
which extend beyond the times of kindergarten and school (and
are after those, typically), while a Krippe is for babies up
to 3 years and is more like a Kindergarten, apart from the
age. It would really be much more logical and easier to
introduce / accept nurseries (there's a reason there is a
specific term for this in language, no?), then throw most but
not all of "child-related-stuff" in the same cauldron where
you will have to dig for age group and other specfic tags in
order to make sense of it.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
There is always a reason having a specific term for different parts
of childcare - it is simply easier to talk about a Krippe(nursery),
Kindergarten, Hort(after school club) instead of a childcare with
age_group 0-3, 4-6, 7-14.<br>
And it is quite logical to take these terms as tags - in the first
attempt ....<br>
But is it really easier to end up with three different amenities -
and so with different POIs - for a childcare which enrols all age
groups?<br>
Nevertheless the min or max age sometimes differs at the same sort
of institution - so you may look e. g. after a hort but still have
to check for the valid age anyway.<br>
</body>
</html>