<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/21/18 11:23 AM, François Lacombe
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAG0ygLdwoEimDFcX+FB3Tegs6kNTcxrDnRps0C5Fj7aiNbgjaA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="auto">
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">Le dim. 21 oct. 2018 à 09:21, Martin
Koppenhoefer <<a href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>> a
écrit :</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
no, the argument is that this is a basic distinction which
anyone can make, without knowing about transmission,
distribution or voltage.<br>
<br>
Line is on poles? so it is a minor line. On towers? line.<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAG0ygLdwoEimDFcX+FB3Tegs6kNTcxrDnRps0C5Fj7aiNbgjaA@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="auto">
<div dir="auto">Which is not true because you find poles more
massive than tiny towers.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Big... small... minor... major what does that
mean?</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>height=* then ? A bit harder to describe for the novice
contributor, but still within reach with no specific technical
skills and it adds a measure of objectivity to the description.
cables=* is even easier. Both provide a beginning of importance
classification, accessible with no domain knowledge of the
electric network. Maybe that is the way forward ?<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>