<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
22. Oct 2018 17:28 by <a href="mailto:frederik@remote.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">frederik@remote.org</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">On 10/22/18 11:03, François Lacombe wrote:<blockquote>Even if sub_station is often 1:1 of substation, this have to be replaced<br />carefully since objects can have been mis tagged as power=sub_station.<br />In France, last objects where removed this summer. There was about 150<br />of them and it was not so hard to review each one.</blockquote><br />I think a manual review is certainly better than an automated<br />conversion. If an object uses a tagging scheme that has long since been<br />replaced with a new one, maybe the object itself has also ceased to<br />exist, or demands some kind of change.<br /><br />Manual review may be slower but yields a higher-quality result.<br /></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>I agree that manual review of anything improbes map, but I am not sure</p><p>why mistagged power=sub_station is better or worse than mistagged</p><p>power=substation<br /></p> </body>
</html>