<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
25. Oct 2018 23:39 by <a href="mailto:marc_marc_irc@hotmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">marc_marc_irc@hotmail.com</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">so my request is : how to avoid again a multi-meaning tag ?</blockquote><p><br /></p><p>Create multiple tags and do not attempt to create shortcut again.</p><p><br /></p><p>In general crossing tag is attempting to tag several different things <br /></p><p>at once - for example how I am supposed to tag crossing with island,</p><p>traffic lights and zebra markings in Poland?</p><p> <br /></p><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">may/must we separate the type of crossing from the ground marking ?<br /></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>Yes. For example in Poland there are crossing markings that look</p><p>very similar and have the same name with different legal <br /></p><p>implications.</p><p><br /></p><p>People in that situation will use crossing=zebra, no matter what was</p><p>original intention of fist uers and what is documented on wiki</p><p>as the intended meaning,<br /></p><p> <br /></p><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">it doesn't scare me to propose a mass edition once a coherent scheme<br />has been found. </blockquote><p><br /></p><p>Note that it is unfixable with mass edit. Resurvey of everything is basically needed.<br /></p><p>And it is one more reason for people caring about this information to fix it as</p><p>soon as possible.<br /></p> </body>
</html>