<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 01:01, Tom Pfeifer <<a href="mailto:t.pfeifer@computer.org">t.pfeifer@computer.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On 26.10.2018 16:41, Robert Skedgell wrote:<br>
> On 26/10/18 11:44, Tom Pfeifer wrote:<br>
>> Tagging "unmarked crossings" does not make sense for me. An unmarked<br>
>> crossing is defined in OSM by a road and a footway sharing a node, there<br>
>> is no need for a tag here, as there is nothing special.<br>
> <br>
> An unmarked crossing may have no road markings or signs, but if there is<br>
> tactile paving and/or a raised/lowered/flush kerb on the footway<br>
> (sidewalk), how else would one tag it?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>So how would you tag this situation:  <a href="https://www.google.com/maps/@-28.0707782,153.4362109,3a,75y,140.17h,73.2t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s0bHjLjjqqe1rrdNWfLu94g!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D0bHjLjjqqe1rrdNWfLu94g%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D296.4197%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656">https://www.google.com/maps/@-28.0707782,153.4362109,3a,75y,140.17h,73.2t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s0bHjLjjqqe1rrdNWfLu94g!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D0bHjLjjqqe1rrdNWfLu94g%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D296.4197%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656</a></div><div><br></div><div>There is a footpath along the side of the road, which drops to road level via a lowered kerb, to meet up with another lowered kerb on the other side of the road. There are no signs or markings of any sort.</div><div><br></div><div>I map them as crossing=unmarked</div><div><br></div><div>Any other suggestions?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div><div><br></div><div>Graeme</div></div></div></div>