<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1251">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">I would envision it
including the state-level representations plus the various
non-diplomatic "liaison offices" and "institutes" (e.g.,
American Institute in Taiwan) that are pseudo-embassies and in
many cases lack both diplomatic status and immunities. So
diplomatic_representation would probably be a bridge too far.</font><br>
</p>
On 11/1/2018 10:16 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:9149A927-FBB7-4BD8-A30C-4891B87085E3@gmail.com">
<pre wrap="">
sent from a phone
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 1. Nov 2018, at 17:57, Allan Mustard <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:allan@mustard.net"><allan@mustard.net></a> wrote:
How about amenity=embassy, amenity=consulate, plus amenity=representation to capture those facilities that are neither pudding nor frozen, er, sorry, neither embassies nor consulates? Any heartburn there? Then we use diplomatic=* as an additional tag (i.e., continue current practice) to specify different flavors, er, types of diplomatic/consular mission? Should I modify the proposed feature to that?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
+1, maybe “representation” could become “diplomatic_representation” or would that be incorrect for some of them? I see it is unwieldy, but “representation” alone can mean a link of things, so I would suggest to be more verbose.
Cheers,
Martin
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>