<html><head></head><body>Agreed with Martin here, I would be amazed that the name of a pipeline would contradict the name of one of its section being something else than a pipeline.<br>Dave, you missed a very important rule: Keep it simple.<br>On roads (routes for cars), a pretty common thing) ref=xxx can be found on ways in simple cases. <br>Yves <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 7 novembre 2018 17:08:50 GMT+01:00, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist@gmail.com> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Am Mi., 7. Nov. 2018 um 16:40 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny <<a href="mailto:matkoniecz@tutanota.com">matkoniecz@tutanota.com</a>>:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div><div style="margin-left:40px">
7. Nov 2018 08:27 by <a href="mailto:daveswarthout@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">daveswarthout@gmail.com</a>:</div><div style="margin-left:40px">In the case of the pipeline, tags like man_made=pipeline, substance=oil, operator, Wikipedia and Wikidata tags, belong in the relation.</div><p><br></p><p>For the record: I strongly disagree with that invention.<br></p> </div></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>I also believe with the current state of things, most tags for the pipeline should remain on the ways. I would agree for the wikipedia and wikidata tags to be sufficient on the relation (or relations for specific parts of it), which refer to the pipeline as a whole.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,<br></div><div>Martin<br></div></div>
</blockquote></div></body></html>