<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/11/2018 13:21, Noémie Lehuby
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:2bd5c31c-d450-769d-baed-5a0e3419dc22@qwant.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<p>Should we consider the disputed=yes tag on boundary ways as a <i>de
facto</i> standard and uniformize a few borders ? </p>
</blockquote>
<br>
Can you give examples of where you'd use it? There are many, many
examples of disputed borders in OSM and they have been mapped in
different ways. Each dispute is different - sometimes theren't no
dispute about where the border is, just about the status. Sometimes
there are oddities (like Bir Tawil) where there are both different
overlapping claims and completely unclaimed territory. <br>
<br>
You gave a couple of examples of "different ways of mapping" in OSM
in an earlier post, saying that some examples in OSM don't match
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf">https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf</a>
. You also gave a couple of examples where there are overlapping
borders in OSM. I can think of a couple of places (Somalia /
Somaliland is one example, various maritime disputes are others)
where this may actually be the best way of mapping reality. I'm not
convinced a simple "disputed=yes" tag would help much.<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:2bd5c31c-d450-769d-baed-5a0e3419dc22@qwant.com">
<p>Should we create a proposal about this tag ?<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
Without a bit more discussion about what the problem that you're
trying to solve here actually is I'm not convinced that that will
help<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:2bd5c31c-d450-769d-baed-5a0e3419dc22@qwant.com">
<p> The borders data do not fit the doc... </p>
</blockquote>
<br>
Just to be clear, which documentation are you actually talking
about? There are lots of bits and pieces in the OSM wiki, and lots
of them contradict one another.<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:2bd5c31c-d450-769d-baed-5a0e3419dc22@qwant.com">
<p>...and the statement from the Foundation and are not really
usable right now...<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
Can you give an example of a border that you can't apply the
examples in DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf to? What problem are
you actually trying to solve? are you:<br>
<br>
<ul>
<li>Trying to find a graphical representation showing that "there
is a dispute here"?</li>
<li>Trying to parcel up the world into best-fit single territories
(to avoid double counting) for non-graphical processing?<br>
</li>
<li>Trying to display actual territorial control?</li>
<li>Trying to show what type of dispute exists somewhere?</li>
</ul>
<br>
All of these are somewhat different problems... I'm not saying that
there isn't a problem to be solved here (in fact there are many
different ones).<br>
<br>
Best Regards,<br>
<br>
Andy<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>