<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /></head><body style='font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif'>
<p>On 2018-12-12 08:51, Markus wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 11:49, Colin Smale <<a href="mailto:colin.smale@xs4all.nl">colin.smale@xs4all.nl</a>> wrote:<br /> Check out Sydney, where they are using APS for some urban parts of a light rail system:<br /><br /><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBD_and_South_East_Light_Rail" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBD_and_South_East_Light_Rail</a><br /><br /> Never say never... Even if it is uncommon, our tagging should be flexible enough to handle it, do you agree?<br /> Thanks for the interesting link. I agree and try to be more precise in<br /> the future. :-)</div>
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace"> </div>
</blockquote>
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">Actually in this case I would say it would be a question of being less precise and not specifying things which don't need to be specified, or in other words keeping dimensions which are not intrinsically connected out of each other's way. Type of power supply (overhead, 3rd rail etc) has no connection to the class of the system (tram, light rail, metro, heavy rail etc) - all combinations are possible, even if some combinations are more popular than others. One does not imply the other.</div>
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace"> </div>
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">Colin</div>
</body></html>