<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><br><br><div id="AppleMailSignature" dir="ltr">sent from a phone</div><div dir="ltr"><br>On 17. Dec 2018, at 13:34, Sergio Manzi <<a href="mailto:smz@smz.it">smz@smz.it</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">I added emphasys to part of your quote to underline how I fail to
understand how a "structural detail" cannot be construed as a
sub-key of... structure.</div></blockquote><br><div><br></div><div>you should rather have looked at the whole thread, I was replying to this paragraph by the OT: “<span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">I'm not convinced soft_storey should be its own key or rather a structural characteristic of a building. For example, building:structure is widely used to tell if buildings are made of masonry, reinforced concrete, etc. It would make sense for soft_storey to be a value of that key. <a href="https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/building:structure">https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/building:structure</a>”</span></div><div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><br></span></div><div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><br></span></div><div>Cheers, Martin </div></body></html>