<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Thank-you Claudius,</p>
<p>I've posted an answer in the forum, but I'm afraid it is awaiting
for moderation (I'm new to the forum...).</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Sergio</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2018-12-18 22:20, Claudius Henrichs
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:trinity-fda1500e-6b1d-461b-8362-964329eb0a65-1545168035798@3c-app-gmx-bs21">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;">
<div>I couldn't be happier to have the "Benefits of namespaces"
discussion happening right now on this ML.</div>
<div>I am about to finalize a tagging proposal for a new
sub-tag. I am wondering about the pros and cons of the
traditional "OSM tag chain" (foo=bar + bar=baz) versus
"Laymans namespacing" (foo=bar + bar:type=baz). I've laid out
what I found on the forum and would be curious to learn what
your recommendation be. Particularly in regard to improved
human readability versus "staying true to the definition of
namespace":</div>
<div><font style="background-color:#ffffff"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64825">https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64825</a></font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font style="background-color:#ffffff">I am happy for you
to reply here on the ML and I will try to summarize your
input in the forum thread this coming weekend.</font></div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>