<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 at 23:52, LeTopographeFou <<a href="mailto:letopographefou@gmail.com">letopographefou@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>I'm ok to consider a proposal which would lead to the
      tourism=accomodation schema.</p>
    <p>But I think that whatever we do (new schema vs existing schema)
      an "Accomodation" wiki page (routing to hotel/motel/... tags) will
      be helpfull to today route to existing tags and maybe tomorrow
      explain the new schema.</p></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I agree with most of what has been said here, especially "the only practical distinction today is the name on the front sign", however </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Le 01/01/2019 à 03:23, Silent Spike a
      écrit :<br></p>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div dir="ltr">the current
          information there considers motels to be a subclass of hotels
          (so all motels are hotels, not all hotels are motels). </div></div></blockquote></div></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><blockquote type="cite"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><blockquote type="cite"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><blockquote type="cite"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 6:27
                              AM Allan Mustard <<a href="mailto:allan@mustard.net" target="_blank">allan@mustard.net</a>>
                              wrote:<br></div></div><div class="gmail_quote">
                            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                              <div dir="ltr"><div>Local licensing authorities do
                                  not differentiate between them and
                                  they are regulated identically, </div></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></blockquote><div>As I mentioned previously, in Australia at least, licensing authorities <i>do</i> differentiate between them, in that a hotel is licensed to sell alcohol, while a motel isn't. Granted, that doesn't effect accommodation options, but a motel is not, strictly speaking, a hotel.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks </div><div><br></div><div>Graeme</div></div></div>