<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/01/2019 13:51, Steve Doerr wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:d23893d8-e852-95eb-2f69-3cc5b4f21cbf@gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/01/2019 12:56, Paul Allen
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPy1dO+wF1nzPMX5KouCoaHLQ4tzCUweA1YjhrGugW+pdXnuew@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8">
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPy1dO+wF1nzPMX5KouCoaHLQ4tzCUweA1YjhrGugW+pdXnuew@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>All you actually need is some form of tag for a TOP. <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</blockquote>
Agreed<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:d23893d8-e852-95eb-2f69-3cc5b4f21cbf@gmail.com">
<p> </p>
<p>designation = toeristisch_overstappunt<br>
</p>
<div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Notwithstanding the 'It's not a "legal classification"' that was
top-posted in a follow-up message, that's a better option than
anything else so far.<br>
<br>
There's actually something that essentially conforms to
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toeristisch_Overstappunt">https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toeristisch_Overstappunt</a> /
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://translate.google.com/#view=home&op=translate&sl=nl&tl=en&text=https%3A%2F%2Fnl.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FToeristisch_Overstappunt">https://translate.google.com/#view=home&op=translate&sl=nl&tl=en&text=https%3A%2F%2Fnl.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FToeristisch_Overstappunt</a>
outside of Chesterfield station in the UK . There's no TOP-style
"obelisk" but there is the very prominent logo of the Trans-Pennine
Trail, which is the path that it serves. I've just added the info
board at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6201454917">https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6201454917</a> , but the
other features (easy access from multiple modes of transport) were
there already.<br>
<br>
There's no way that I'd map it as a trailhead though, whereas the
ones that Kevin Kenny describes in his mail today obviously are.<br>
<br>
Best Regards,<br>
<br>
Andy<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>