<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">Jan 21, 2019, 12:03 AM by 61sundowner@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div style="16px" text-align="left">The end to this madness is for renders to recognise that the landuse=forest needs to be rendered differently from natural=wood.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">The essential difference between the two is that landuse must have some human benefit, a produce, and a clear way of doing that is to add the rendering of a axe to the tree.<br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left"><div style="16px" text-align="left"><div style="16px" text-align="left"><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div></div></div></div><div style="16px">(1) in a typical <g class="gr_ gr_659 gr-alert gr_gramm gr_inline_cards gr_run_anim Punctuation only-ins replaceWithoutSep" id="659" data-gr-id="659">rendering</g> this distinction is completely unimportant<br></div><div style="16px">or at least not worth different rendering<br></div><div style="16px"><br></div><div style="16px">(2) other people have different mismatching ideas what is the<br></div><div style="16px">"real" difference between natural=wood and landuse=forest<br></div><div style="16px"><br></div><div style="16px">(3) there is no consistent difference in how natural=wood and landuse=forest are used<br></div><div style="16px">by mappers<br></div><div style="16px"><br></div><div style="16px"><br></div> </body>
</html>