<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 24/01/19 01:34, althio wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAF7V8Bz1q8tQH-X=V6LfgEXTCfVk_dZvKgOS+Yg=0vOHPKYVFQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>I might be missing something in these threads, but I would
expect...</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>for managed forest areas with unknown or unspecified use:</div>
<div>landuse=forestry</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Why not natural=wood? That does not exclude "managed".<br>
Other things may also be "managed" - swamps, lakes, heath and scrub
for instance. <br>
<br>
<br>
How do you know it is 'managed'??? <br>
If you know it is "managed" .. what is it "managed" for? <br>
<br>
Should there be a tagging system for this "management"? <br>
If so it has to be separate from trees as those are not the only
thing that are managed. <br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAF7V8Bz1q8tQH-X=V6LfgEXTCfVk_dZvKgOS+Yg=0vOHPKYVFQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>for managed forest areas used primarily to grow wood as
timber/fuel/... or anything else:</div>
<div>
<div>landuse=forestry</div>
+ forestry = logging/timber/leisure/wildlife/*<br
class="gmail-Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
The key produce can be used to specify the output, just as it can be
for the farmers field. <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:produce">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:produce</a><br>
There are no OSM tags to specify leisure/wildlife .. and those could
be applied to lakes, national parks, etc. <br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAF7V8Bz1q8tQH-X=V6LfgEXTCfVk_dZvKgOS+Yg=0vOHPKYVFQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This kind of scheme seems to allow incremental mapping
which is in my opinion desirable.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-- althio</div>
<div> </div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 13:36, Paul Allen <<a
href="mailto:pla16021@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true">pla16021@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 08:29, Mateusz
Konieczny <<a href="mailto:matkoniecz@tutanota.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">matkoniecz@tutanota.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px
0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div><br>
<div>You may prefer to use landuse=logging or
something that has a clear meaning<br>
</div>
<div>rather than landuse=forestry to tag areas used
primarily to grow wood.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Given the wikipedia page you pointed to earlier in
the thread, I agree that <br>
</div>
<div>landuse=forestry is a bad idea (almost as bad as
landuse=forest was). ...<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>