<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div></div></div></div></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 08:33, Warin <<a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="gmail-m_8559389749095235316moz-cite-prefix">On 24/01/19 09:19, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">Was mapping yesterday, put in an area, then when I
started searching for the description, iD brought up one
of it's totally inappropriate suggestions of clearcut: <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aman_made%3Dclearcut" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aman_made%3Dclearcut</a>,
together with a beautiful icon of a chainsaw! :-) A
reword to say that this is an area dedicted to forestry
/ logging & may or may not be covered by trees at
any time, may cover it?<br></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
No. <br>
Not all tree harvesting is done by clear felling. Some are
selectively logged. <br>
<br>
Not all areas are 'man_made', some are 'natural' at least to my view
point. <br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Fair enough, but it's a beautiful icon though, & a nice modern equivalent of your "axe in a tree" suggestion! :-)</div><div> </div><div>Thanks<div><br></div><div>Graeme</div></div></div></div>