<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 15.02.2019 um 17:09 schrieb
Hubert87:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:ae4ff3f1-58f1-6444-ee91-9b72bfb66957@gmx.de">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p>why not use foot=use_sidepath and/or sidewalk=no? In
combination with hw=primary/secondary, routers should be able to
work out that that route is a bad one.<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, not all foot=no roads do have a sidepath. And anyway this
discussion is on whether the sidewalk=none and absence of a foot=*
warrants asking the user for it.<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:ae4ff3f1-58f1-6444-ee91-9b72bfb66957@gmx.de">
<p>Also OT the city should declare that tunnel a motorroad, or put
up signs disallowing pedestrians and bicycle riders (and
horses), like <a
href="https://www.google.de/maps/@50.9401298,6.9532164,3a,75y,354.53h,97t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s-BF_bbPXwIa2GD2DghRJZQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656"
moz-do-not-send="true">opposite direction</a> of your first
example.<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:ae4ff3f1-58f1-6444-ee91-9b72bfb66957@gmx.de">
<p>Also people using routers should apply common sense, too. Or
stay at home.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, tell that the city. I could list you any number of cases in
my city where the officials have not signed everything we would
like it in OSM. We also need to apply common sense when mapping.</p>
<p>Tobias W<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
</body>
</html>