<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 22:31, Paul Allen <<a href="mailto:pla16021@gmail.com">pla16021@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div></div></div></div></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 12:08, marc marc <<a href="mailto:marc_marc_irc@hotmail.com" target="_blank">marc_marc_irc@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Le 20.02.19 à 12:39, Colin Smale a écrit :<br>
> "T2H" could be enough. What's the minimum IQ required to understand <br>
> "T2H", "T30M" or "5D"?<br>
<br>
ask other mapper how to tag "2 hours" in the iso form.<br>
I doubt that 1% 'll reply "T2H" without first reading the doc.<br>
it not only the IQ, it's also the use of user-not-friendly value.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>One day we're going to have to decide whether OSM is about masturbation or sex. Either<br></div><div>we're doing this for ourselves alone or we're trying to produce something that will be</div><div>appreciated and used by non-mappers. If we're masturbating then T2H30M is fine. If</div><div>we're trying to have sex then 2.5 hours is the way to go.</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This,</div><div><br></div><div>Is OSM supposed to be for a tight, dedicated group of expert mappers trying to create the best, most accurate, technically-perfect map the World has ever seen; or is it for the use of John Doe & Jane Public using OSMAND & Maps Me on their mobile phones to find their way from Point A to Point B, or round a strange town?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks<div><br></div><div>Graeme</div></div></div></div>