<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2019-03-05 12:48, Marián Kyral
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:bC.YDRz.79RNAewMrbY.1SVc81@seznam.cz">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<br>
<aside>
---------- Původní e-mail ----------<br>
Od: Mateusz Konieczny <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:matkoniecz@tutanota.com"><matkoniecz@tutanota.com></a><br>
Komu: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org"><tagging@openstreetmap.org></a><br>
Datum: 5. 3. 2019 12:35:28<br>
Předmět: Re: [Tagging] leisure=common replacement for public
areas with some trees
</aside>
<br>
<blockquote data-email="matkoniecz@tutanota.com">
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Mar 5, 2019, 11:48 AM by <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:smz@smz.it">smz@smz.it</a>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-left:1px solid
#93A3B8;padding-left:10px;margin-left:5px">
<p>Hi!<br>
</p>
<div>On 2019-03-05 11:13, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Mar 5, 2019, 9:00 AM by <a rel="noopener noreferrer"
href="mailto:mkyral@email.cz" moz-do-not-send="true">mkyral@email.cz</a>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-left:1px solid
#93A3B8;padding-left:10px;margin-left:5px">
<div>Typically a small areas in the city between
apartment buildings. These areas are not official
parks, gardens or grass. It is just a green accessible
for everoyne. So we can say it is a *public* or
*common* green.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>So far I usually tagged such places as follows:<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Made sure that it is within landuse=residential (as
it is a residential area)<br>
</div>
<div>Mapped physical features (leisure=playground,
natural=tree, landuse=grass, highway=footway etc)<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Is it land<b>use</b>=grass or land<b>cover</b>=grass? I
tend to agree with Alessandro Sarretta who uses
landcover...<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<div>landcover=grass also would be fine in this case, but
meaning of this tags is the same and<br>
</div>
<div>landuse=grass is more popular</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>landcover=grass - still not rendered:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402959582">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402959582</a><br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Thanks for hinting about landcover=grass not being rendered (<i>I
guess we should open a Github issue for that if one doesn't
exist already...</i>).</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:bC.YDRz.79RNAewMrbY.1SVc81@seznam.cz">
<div>landuse=grass - means that there will be landuse (grass) on
landuse (residental). Is this OK? I'm not sure If I want to
create a lots of multipolygons because of this.</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>As I already mentioned in a different context, I think the
correct technique would be to be to just draw one multipolygon (<i>the
"main" one, probably tagged with landuse=residential in this
case</i>), and then create a new relation, containing just the
"main" multipolygon, and tag that relation with the secondary
landuse.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:bC.YDRz.79RNAewMrbY.1SVc81@seznam.cz">
<div>Marián</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>