<div dir="auto">Unfortunately dataset I'm manually importing has a boolean "pets" field. <div dir="auto">I guess if go for "dogs" it will be 9/10 right, while a generic "pets" 99/100 (considering the alligator anomaly :-) <span style="font-family:sans-serif">The latter has less taginfo popularity, but better fits source data.</span></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Il gio 7 mar 2019, 14:09 seirra blake <<a href="mailto:sophietheopossum@yandex.com" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">sophietheopossum@yandex.com</a>> ha scritto:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>while I can't see a problem with a tag for each pet, it may still
make more sense to have a pets tag and just namespace
species/related things under it similar to the access tag. use
cases I can think of:</p>
<ul>
<li>pets=no | no matter what, no pets</li>
<li>pets=yes | open to all or at least most pets other than
specified examples such as...</li>
<li>pets:dogs=no | dogs that are pets are not allowed, a guide dog
does not necessarily count as a pet or at least, I don't think
of one as being a pet.</li>
<li>pets:cats=1 | only one cat allowed</li>
</ul>
<p>this does still make it vague in the sense that if only one cat
is allowed, is it per party or per person, but this probably could
be made more specific with another tag namespaced under pets (my
mind is blank, I haven't eaten yet. however this feels like the
best approach to cover most situations). this may also be useful
for things like water-bowls/treats for pets as mentioned elsewhere
here; for example: my bank offers dog biscuits for dogs, the train
station used to offer a water-bowl as well, but I haven't put much
thought into seeing if it's there after the take over by LNER.<br>
</p>
<div class="m_8404512313239871292m_-1598954776381783144m_-8557107311946873670moz-cite-prefix">On 3/7/19 12:17 PM, Paul Allen wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 12:05, <<a href="mailto:phil@trigpoint.me.uk" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">phil@trigpoint.me.uk</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Pets is probably a bit
vague, many hotels will accept pet dogs, but are less
likely to accept cats and extremely unlikely to my pet
alligator (no I don't really own one).<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Some holiday cottages accept dogs but place a limit on
the number (only one; a maximum of two; etc.)</div>
<div>Yes, some do accept cats, and there are many cat owners
who would love to be able to take their</div>
<div>cat on holiday with them. So it would be nice if we had
something a little more flexible than</div>
<div>dog=yes/no.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
Obviously dogs=no will only apply to pets, registered
assistance dogs are covered by the law of the country, in
the UK a hotel/pub/restaurant is not allowed to refuse
assistance dogs. I assume the same is true throughout the
EU.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I believe that, in the UK, NO business can refuse
assistance dogs (but I could be wrong). It's also</div>
<div>the case in the UK that non-assistance dogs are NOT
legally prohibited from pubs and</div>
<div>restaurants but only from food preparation areas: it's
the owner's decision as to whether or not</div>
<div>dogs are allowed where food is served and sold. See</div>
<div>
<div><a href="https://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/our-resources/kennel-club-campaigns/be-dog-friendly/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/our-resources/kennel-club-campaigns/be-dog-friendly/</a><br>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Many shops and a few restaurants in my town display a
sign somewhere saying that dogs</div>
<div> are allowed.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-- <br>
</div>
<div>Paul</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="m_8404512313239871292m_-1598954776381783144m_-8557107311946873670mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="m_8404512313239871292m_-1598954776381783144m_-8557107311946873670moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="m_8404512313239871292m_-1598954776381783144m_-8557107311946873670moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="m_8404512313239871292m_-1598954776381783144m_-8557107311946873670moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</blockquote></div>