<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2019-03-08 01:39, Warin wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:706fb827-6a15-5fb1-86f1-e5a7935b6dc8@gmail.com">On
08/03/19 10:40, Sergio Manzi wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On 2019-03-08 00:35, François Lacombe
wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Hi all
<br>
<br>
The line attachments proposal has been updated according to
comments received all along past weeks. Thanks to TOGA and
Nakaner mainly.
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Lines_clamps">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Lines_clamps</a>
<br>
<br>
It is not restricted to power nor telecom lines. Any line can
be anchored or held with suspension clamps over heads.
<br>
<br>
This sounds to be ok for me and may be voted shortly.
<br>
Feel free to raise objections or comments prior of this to
help building a more useful tagging.
<br>
<br>
All the best
<br>
<br>
François
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
... I suppose a vote for bolts and nuts is imminent too, isn't
it?
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Nuts on trees?
<br>
<br>
------------
<br>
Providing a way for something to be sensibly tagged is what this
is about.
<br>
If enough people map it and then a render shows it then it is
justified.
<br>
If few map it and no one renders it the it will wither on the
line. (pun).
<br>
<br>
Let the mappers vote on if it should be in OSM by using or not
using it.
<br>
Here we should be getting the best tags, not thinking 'this is not
something for OSM' as that is one persons view.
<br>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>... beside that "<i>this one person</i>" happens to have a name,
Sergio, and feels fully entitled to express his opinion about "<i>this
not being something for OSM</i>", as much as those who are using
those tags which I'm convinced will be minimally and sparsely
used.</p>
<p>Sergio<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>