<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>pet=permissive? although if the operator does straight out say
'pets allowed' without any further suggestion (be it images, small
print or whatever) I guess it would be yes until proven otherwise
or further explained/surveyed. if this does get put in an article
it may be worth noting that it's preferable by far to avoid using
pet=yes because few places actually allow any pet without
restrictions. on a fun side note though, my friend has quite
extensively confirmed that London tube is ferret=yes. there are
some namespaces that may still be useful though, I'll give some
examples: dog:leash_only to indicate if they need to be on a leash
or can roam freely; useful for parks which in some areas are
starting to impose leash only parks and ferret:carry_only to
indicate if the pet needs to be in a carrier/other suitable vessel
(be it a bag that's open/ventilated or an article of clothing or
whatever) as whilst their pet ferret is fine in their hood, I
imagine if it was roaming freely it may not get such a warm
reception.<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/9/19 1:14 PM, Paul Allen wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPy1dOJVrWTy6f=VSB984QBa-nLMoZJ2JYu5ZRqWJDmUiiDw0g@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 18:11, Martin Koppenhoefer
<<a href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> We should strive for
least specific tagging restrictions necessary to describe
what we want.
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>pet=no (generally no animals allowed)</div>
<div>dog=yes (but dogs are)</div>
<div>bird=yes (birds as well)<br>
</div>
<div>parrot=no (but parrots not)<br>
</div>
<div>etc.</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">For allowances it is more difficult
(as the alligator example shows, pet=yes would likely be
too permissive).<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I think we should start from an implicit pet=no. Simply
because pet=yes includes my pet</div>
<div>elephant, your pet boa constrictor and his pet lion and
so we're usually going to have</div>
<div>pet=no with an exception list. So we might as well say
that pet=no is implicitly assumed</div>
<div>if an exception list is present. Or pet=no is the
default unless explicitly over-ridden by</div>
<div>either pet=yes or an exception list. And if it's the
default assumption if there is no</div>
<div>exception list or pet=yes then there no reason to tag it
explicitly (you can if you want, but it's</div>
<div>not necessary).<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
I also think pet=yes ought not be used and we need something
like pet=check_with_operator,
<div>except that is ugly. I can't think of a better value,
though.<br>
</div>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-- <br>
</div>
<div>Paul</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>