<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">Mar 11, 2019, 3:15 PM by lorenzostucchi95@outlook.it:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div style="16px" text-align="left">The idea was to map: bareland, artificial surface and forest.<br></div><div class=""><br></div><div class="">Should be a good idea to map following this idea?<br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">Mapping forests (or more accurately tree-covered areas) is useful and welcomed.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">But two other categories are more complicated, in OSM areas are mapped <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">more accurately.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">For example we are not mapping "bareland"/"artificial surface" but more specific<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">objects like <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">landuse=construction (construction site)<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">landuse=farmland<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">landuse=meadow <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">landuse=railway <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">natural=beach<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">landuse=industrial<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">etc etc<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">Note that <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Rudolf/draft_landcover">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Rudolf/draft_landcover</a><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">is proposal from 2014 and is rarely used (not used) in mapping.<br></div> </body>
</html>