<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">Mar 13, 2019, 12:33 AM by graemefitz1@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div style="16px" text-align="left">I have no idea how we could improve things so there is more feedback - maybe remove the discussion page from the proposals, so all discussion has to happen on the tagging list?<br></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">It will rather reduce discussion. People from OSM wiki are more likely to stop commenting rather<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">than start using mailing list. And why commenting on talk page would be worse than commenting on ml?<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">People that participate in mailing list (or Wiki or IRC or forum or slack or XYZ) discussions<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">are extreme outliers of mappers, but given no alternative it is <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">OK to assume that their opinion sort represent all OSM mappers.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">We are de facto self-elected representative of mappers - it is a really biased sample, it <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">would be nice to change it but blocking discussion on established site is unlikely to help.<br></div> </body>
</html>