<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">Mar 16, 2019, 3:08 PM by dieterdreist@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">On 16. Mar 2019, at 13:11, Jan S <<a rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" href="mailto:grimpeur78@gmail.com">grimpeur78@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">All other police facilites, that may currently have been tagged erroneously as amenity=police would be tagged only as police=*,<br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">The „problem“ with this approach is that maps who base the presence of objects in their renderings on the presence of specific keys will likely not happen to find these police=* things in their database.<br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">Why not? Is it concern about technical difficulties or that they would be unaware that <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">this tag exists?<br></div> </body>
</html>