<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 29/03/19 17:59, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:E0478A28-8F06-499F-9751-051E65DA980E@gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<br>
<br>
<div id="AppleMailSignature" dir="ltr">sent from a phone</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
On 29. Mar 2019, at 07:05, Warin <<a
href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><span>This one has been sitting for a long while!
Still not certain about some aspects of it.</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>See what you make of it.</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span><span><a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Area-steps"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Area-steps</a></span></span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>Discussion here for preference.</span></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>can you explain how it relates to this proposal?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Area"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Area</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
That proposal is very broad , it defines implicit areas of any kind,
steps, ramps, flat bits . I think that is too much in one proposal
to consider and detail.<br>
<br>
<br>
This proposal only does steps. Just steps. It details how larger
step areas, > say 5 m width, can be mapped. <br>
<br>
Consider in this proposal;<br>
should the upper and lower ways be tagged with highway=footway so as
to connect the two laterals? <br>
should the laterals be tagged with highway=steps <br>
That may aid editing, rendering and routing... <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>