<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">Apr 17, 2019, 7:34 PM by geodesy99@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class="">> ... As a rule of thumb i'd say something that can at least coarsely be <br></div><div class="">> surveyed on the ground by a single mapper during a single day is <br></div><div class="">> usually suitable to be mapped as a distinct named feature, provided it <br></div><div class="">> is otherwise verifiable of course. ... <br></div><div class=""><br></div><div class="">If everyone on Earth joined OSM and limited their mapping <br></div><div class="">to their own local knowledge using that rule of thumb, our map <br></div><div class="">would look like this :-) <a href="http://bit.ly/2IGkgoj" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">http://bit.ly/2IGkgoj</a><br></div></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">Nobody proposed ban on mapping things far away from your place of residence. <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div> </body>
</html>