<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 18/04/19 09:52, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP_2vPghxsp9YhrFqTNy9Cq_=Jr36U8nXeXF7ej2F7KJL8uWxA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><br>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">But if a locality represents only a historic
location that has no physical presence today, it is
debatable if this is a “real and current” feature that is
appropriate for OSM rather than a historical map. <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
If the name is still in present use then it belongs in OSM, even if
there is no physical presence on the ground people still use the
name to define the place. <br>
</body>
</html>