<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Hi Clifford,<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/05/19 00:13, Clifford Snow wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CADAoPLotxFNMh7iVtHD7w1uTKdExWL3kAh3v5cHbmJc_PAsxFg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">Since the off loading area is
called an access aisle, both in the US and UK [2], it seem
to me that it would be an appropriate term to use. Would
using highway=footway + footway=access_aisle +
wheelchair=yes be a more acceptable tagging scheme? My
concern is that just adding wheelchair=yes to a footway
doesn't get at the requirement for the width of the
access_aisle.
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>[1] <a
href="https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and-sites/about-the-ada-standards/guide-to-the-ada-standards/chapter-5-parking"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and-sites/about-the-ada-standards/guide-to-the-ada-standards/chapter-5-parking</a></div>
<div>[2] <a
href="https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN01360/SN01360.pdf"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN01360/SN01360.pdf</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm really supporting your proposal for a highway=footway +
footway=access_aisle.</p>
<p>I would match this with a wheelchair=designated instead of a
wheelchair=yes, as suggested by Mateusz Konieczny.<br>
</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Ale<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>