<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Hi</p>
    <p>[AA] is a Mapillary picture of a typical UK disabled parking bay,
      the hatched area is a what I think you are calling an 'access
      aisle'.  Those particular disabled parking bays are legally
      designated and enforced.</p>
    <p>I see that tags <tt dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"
        style="background:#EEF;font-size:1em;line-height:1.6"><bdi
          style="white-space:nowrap"><a
            href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity"
            title="Key:amenity">amenity</a></bdi>=<a class="mw-selflink
          selflink"><bdi>parking_space</bdi></a></tt> and <tt dir="ltr"
        class="mw-content-ltr"
        style="background:#EEF;font-size:1em;line-height:1.6"><bdi
          style="white-space:nowrap"><a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:parking_space&action=edit&redlink=1"
            class="new" title="Key:parking space (page does not exist)">parking_space</a></bdi>=<a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:parking_space%3Ddisabled&action=edit&redlink=1"
          class="new" title="Tag:parking space=disabled (page does not
          exist)"><bdi>disabled</bdi></a></tt> </p>
    <p>are not described in the wiki but to my mind an entry for
      parking_space = disabled should meet the local space and marking
      scheme so in the UK a parking_space=disabled would without further
      definition include an egress space. If there is a wish to
      specifically mark those hatched areas then I suggest the use of
      the word 'egress' .<br>
    </p>
    <p>[AA] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/5PAU747rlUdNrCaDtUNDuA">https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/5PAU747rlUdNrCaDtUNDuA</a></p>
    <p>Regards <br>
    </p>
    <p>TonyS999<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/05/2019 10:54, Volker Schmidt
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALQ-OR7Jv2gnah8uS4M1rjDb-eyyJXZARuPS8PfAj4LB_B+oWQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>I would consider what is here described as access aisle
          (according to the photo [1]) part of the parking space. Here
          in Italy any parking space for the disabled has a dedicated
          "access aisle" similar to the photo.<br>
        </div>
        <div>If you want to achieve disabled (wheelchair) routing I
          would assume it to be sufficient to map the disabled parking
          spaces within the car park.<br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>
          [1] <a
            href="https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/F2mAATCQ54SzfcT"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/F2mAATCQ54SzfcT</a>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 11:31,
          Tony Shield <<a href="mailto:tony.shield999@gmail.com"
            moz-do-not-send="true">tony.shield999@gmail.com</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
          0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
            <p>Having today downloaded and read SN01360 [2] |I disagree
              with the interpretation. In that document there is only
              one mention of 'aisle' it being an 'access aisle' in
              Section 5.4 paragraph marked Off-Street Parking  -" <span
style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Bold;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal"><b>Off-street
                  parking</b><span
style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal">:
                  bays should be a minimum of 4800 mm long<br>
                  <span
style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal">by
                    2400 mm wide with additional space: (1) where bays
                    are<br>
                    <span
style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal">parallel
                      to the access aisle and access is available from
                      the side an<br>
                      <span
style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal">extra
                        length of at least 180 0mm, or (2) where bays
                        are<br>
                        <span
style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal">perpendicular
                          to the access aisle, an additional width of at
                          least<br>
                          <span
style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal">1200
                            mm along each side. </span></span></span></span></span><br
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
                </span></span></p>
            <span
style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Bold;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal"><span
style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal"></span></span>
            <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix">I
              read that as saying the 'access aisle' is that which in
              OSM is marked as 'parking _aisle', and it leads to a
              parking bay designated for disabled users, the 'access
              aisle' is not exclusively for the use of disabled users. I
              am of the opinion that 'access' is misinterpreted to refer
              only to disabled users which is a very restrictive
              interpretation of the usual interpretation of access being
              for anybody. I think it is something to be very careful
              about.</div>
            <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix">Usage
              in the UK supports my interpretation - I know of many car
              parks where ordinary and disabled spaces are next to each
              other and accessed by a single way which has no
              restrictions.<br>
            </div>
            <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix"><br>
            </div>
            <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix">For
              parking bays I think that the tag:amenity=parking _space
              is clear.<br>
            </div>
            <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix"><br>
            </div>
            <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix">Regards</div>
            <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix">TonyS999</div>
            <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix"><br>
            </div>
            <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix">On
              02/05/2019 08:21, Alessandro Sarretta wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <p>Hi Clifford,<br>
              </p>
              <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix">On
                02/05/19 00:13, Clifford Snow wrote:<br>
              </div>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div dir="ltr">
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div class="gmail_quote">Since the off loading
                        area is called an access aisle, both in the US
                        and UK [2], it seem to me that it would be an
                        appropriate term to use.  Would using
                        highway=footway + footway=access_aisle +
                         wheelchair=yes be a more acceptable tagging
                        scheme? My concern is that just adding
                        wheelchair=yes to a footway doesn't get at the
                        requirement for the width of the access_aisle. 
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>[1] <a
href="https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and-sites/about-the-ada-standards/guide-to-the-ada-standards/chapter-5-parking"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and-sites/about-the-ada-standards/guide-to-the-ada-standards/chapter-5-parking</a></div>
                        <div>[2]  <a
href="https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN01360/SN01360.pdf"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN01360/SN01360.pdf</a></div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <p>I'm really supporting your proposal for a
                highway=footway + footway=access_aisle.</p>
              <p>I would match this with a wheelchair=designated instead
                of a wheelchair=yes, as suggested by Mateusz Konieczny.<br>
              </p>
              <p>Best,</p>
              <p>Ale<br>
              </p>
              <br>
              <fieldset
                class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
              <pre class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          Tagging mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
          <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>