<div dir="ltr"><div>I would consider what is here described as access aisle (according to the photo [1]) part of the parking space. Here in Italy any parking space for the disabled has a dedicated "access aisle" similar to the photo.<br></div><div>If you want to achieve disabled (wheelchair) routing I would assume it to be sufficient to map the disabled parking spaces within the car park.<br></div><div><br></div><div>
[1] <a href="https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/F2mAATCQ54SzfcT" target="_blank">https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/F2mAATCQ54SzfcT</a>

</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 11:31, Tony Shield <<a href="mailto:tony.shield999@gmail.com">tony.shield999@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Having today downloaded and read SN01360 [2] |I disagree with the
      interpretation. In that document there is only one mention of
      'aisle' it being an 'access aisle' in Section 5.4 paragraph marked
      Off-Street Parking  -" <span style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Bold;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal"><b>Off-street
          parking</b><span style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal">:
          bays should be a minimum of 4800 mm long<br>
          <span style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal">by
            2400 mm wide with additional space: (1) where bays are<br>
            <span style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal">parallel
              to the access aisle and access is available from the side
              an<br>
              <span style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal">extra
                length of at least 180 0mm, or (2) where bays are<br>
                <span style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal">perpendicular
                  to the access aisle, an additional width of at least<br>
                  <span style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal">1200
                    mm along each side. </span></span></span></span></span><br style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
        </span></span></p>
    <span style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Bold;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal"><span style="font-family:FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal"></span></span>
    <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix">I read that as saying the 'access
      aisle' is that which in OSM is marked as 'parking _aisle', and it
      leads to a parking bay designated for disabled users, the 'access
      aisle' is not exclusively for the use of disabled users. I am of
      the opinion that 'access' is misinterpreted to refer only to
      disabled users which is a very restrictive interpretation of the
      usual interpretation of access being for anybody. I think it is
      something to be very careful about.</div>
    <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix">Usage in the UK supports my
      interpretation - I know of many car parks where ordinary and
      disabled spaces are next to each other and accessed by a single
      way which has no restrictions.<br>
    </div>
    <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix">For parking bays I think that the
      tag:amenity=parking _space is clear.<br>
    </div>
    <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix">Regards</div>
    <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix">TonyS999</div>
    <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix">On 02/05/2019 08:21, Alessandro
      Sarretta wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <p>Hi Clifford,<br>
      </p>
      <div class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-cite-prefix">On 02/05/19 00:13, Clifford Snow
        wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div class="gmail_quote">Since the off loading area is
                called an access aisle, both in the US and UK [2], it
                seem to me that it would be an appropriate term to use. 
                Would using highway=footway + footway=access_aisle +
                 wheelchair=yes be a more acceptable tagging scheme? My
                concern is that just adding wheelchair=yes to a footway
                doesn't get at the requirement for the width of the
                access_aisle. 
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>[1] <a href="https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and-sites/about-the-ada-standards/guide-to-the-ada-standards/chapter-5-parking" target="_blank">https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and-sites/about-the-ada-standards/guide-to-the-ada-standards/chapter-5-parking</a></div>
                <div>[2]  <a href="https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN01360/SN01360.pdf" target="_blank">https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN01360/SN01360.pdf</a></div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <p>I'm really supporting your proposal for a highway=footway +
        footway=access_aisle.</p>
      <p>I would match this with a wheelchair=designated instead of a
        wheelchair=yes, as suggested by Mateusz Konieczny.<br>
      </p>
      <p>Best,</p>
      <p>Ale<br>
      </p>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="gmail-m_-6850702075196147787moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </div>

_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</blockquote></div>