<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Having today downloaded and read SN01360 [2] |I disagree with the
interpretation. In that document there is only one mention of
'aisle' it being an 'access aisle' in Section 5.4 paragraph marked
Off-Street Parking -" <span style="font-family:
FrutigerLTStd-Bold;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;"><b>Off-street
parking</b><span style="font-family:
FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;">:
bays should be a minimum of 4800 mm long<br>
<span style="font-family:
FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;">by
2400 mm wide with additional space: (1) where bays are<br>
<span style="font-family:
FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;">parallel
to the access aisle and access is available from the side
an<br>
<span style="font-family:
FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;">extra
length of at least 180 0mm, or (2) where bays are<br>
<span style="font-family:
FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;">perpendicular
to the access aisle, an additional width of at least<br>
<span style="font-family:
FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;">1200
mm along each side. </span></span></span></span></span><br
style=" font-style: normal; font-variant: normal;
font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height:
normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent:
0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; ">
</span></span></p>
<span style="font-family:
FrutigerLTStd-Bold;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;"><span
style="font-family:
FrutigerLTStd-Light;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;"></span></span>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">I read that as saying the 'access
aisle' is that which in OSM is marked as 'parking _aisle', and it
leads to a parking bay designated for disabled users, the 'access
aisle' is not exclusively for the use of disabled users. I am of
the opinion that 'access' is misinterpreted to refer only to
disabled users which is a very restrictive interpretation of the
usual interpretation of access being for anybody. I think it is
something to be very careful about.</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Usage in the UK supports my
interpretation - I know of many car parks where ordinary and
disabled spaces are next to each other and accessed by a single
way which has no restrictions.<br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">For parking bays I think that the
tag:amenity=parking _space is clear.<br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Regards</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">TonyS999</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/05/2019 08:21, Alessandro
Sarretta wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:9de6d2e0-47e9-1eae-c35f-c7c721066a64@gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p>Hi Clifford,<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/05/19 00:13, Clifford Snow
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CADAoPLotxFNMh7iVtHD7w1uTKdExWL3kAh3v5cHbmJc_PAsxFg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">Since the off loading area is
called an access aisle, both in the US and UK [2], it
seem to me that it would be an appropriate term to use.
Would using highway=footway + footway=access_aisle +
wheelchair=yes be a more acceptable tagging scheme? My
concern is that just adding wheelchair=yes to a footway
doesn't get at the requirement for the width of the
access_aisle.
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>[1] <a
href="https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and-sites/about-the-ada-standards/guide-to-the-ada-standards/chapter-5-parking"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and-sites/about-the-ada-standards/guide-to-the-ada-standards/chapter-5-parking</a></div>
<div>[2] <a
href="https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN01360/SN01360.pdf"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN01360/SN01360.pdf</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm really supporting your proposal for a highway=footway +
footway=access_aisle.</p>
<p>I would match this with a wheelchair=designated instead of a
wheelchair=yes, as suggested by Mateusz Konieczny.<br>
</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Ale<br>
</p>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>