<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">11 May 2019, 19:47 by selfishseahorse@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div style="16px" text-align="left">On Sat, 11 May 2019 at 17:05, Johnparis <<a rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" href="mailto:okosm@johnfreed.com">okosm@johnfreed.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">For bus routes, at least, there is an established convention for the name tag. I have mapped hundreds of such routes. It is definitely NOT a "misuse".<br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">It seems quite popular, but it doesn't agree with how the name=* tag<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">is usually used.<br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">The problem is that typical use of name tag for public transport routes is a misuse of name tag,<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">and that using name tag as description is accepted by a proposal.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">The question is whatever it requires separate proposal to fix old proposal or is invoking<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">general rule "name tag is for name, description tag is for description" sufficient.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div> </body>
</html>