<html><head></head><body>Hi,<br><br>I find camp_site:part=* somewhat complicated, too. Also, it wouldn't be consistent with the use of camp_site=* to describe the type of camping site, either.<br><br>I'd prefer tourism=camp_pitch. This also has the advantage that this key can be used for isolated camping pitches that are not part of a proper camping ground.<br><br>Best, Jan<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Am 20. Mai 2019 11:39:17 MESZ schrieb Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenberg@gmail.com>:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">It appears that the proposal for camp_site=camp_pitch will be rejected<br>with 12 votes in opposition out of 26 votes total, for<br><br>A couple of those who voted in opposition would prefer to use<br>"tourism=camp_pitch" instead. There were also a couple of people who<br>suggested "tourism=camp_site:part" and a couple in favor of<br>"camp_site:part=camp_pitch". Several other people voted in opposition<br>but did not specify a preferred alternative.<br><br>So what's that best tag to try instead?<br><br>I think "camp_site:part=*" is rather convoluted, and<br>"tourism=camp_pitch" has the benefit of using a well-known key, but<br>perhaps there are other suggestions?<br><br>On 5/8/19, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenberg@gmail.com> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"> Reminder: voting is underway to approve the tag camp_site=camp_pitch<br> since May 1st so it will continue for the next week till May 14th<br> <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/camp_site_pitch">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/camp_site_pitch</a><br><br> Please check out the proposal page and add your comments or votes:<br> <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/camp_site_pitch#Voting">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/camp_site_pitch#Voting</a><br><br> On 5/1/19, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenberg@gmail.com> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"> I believe the discussion about the tag camp_site=camp_pitch is now<br> complete here. Also see the talk page:<br> <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/camp_site_pitch">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/camp_site_pitch</a><br><br> You can now vote to approve or reject this tag. See:<br> <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/camp_site_pitch">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/camp_site_pitch</a><br><br> Description of camp_site=camp_pitch:<br> "An tent or caravan pitch location within a camp site"<br><br> This proposal provides a way to tag individual pitches within a<br> campground or caravan site. A "camp pitch" in this context is the free<br> space used to place a tent or or caravan within a tourism=camp_site or<br> tourism=caravan_site area. Usually only one caravan is permitted in an<br> individual pitch, but more than 1 tent may be allowed on a single<br> pitch in some cases."<br><br> Please read the proposal and vote:<br> <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/camp_site_pitch#Voting">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/camp_site_pitch#Voting</a><br><br></blockquote></blockquote><hr>Tagging mailing list<br>Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>