<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">23 May 2019, 18:32 by osm@westnordost.de:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div style="16px" text-align="left">reverse this development.<br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">Yes, it would be great. There is plenty of negative emotion on both sides and it<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">would be great to reverse this (for example title that I used was frankly stupid<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">what I realized after sending the message).<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div style="16px" text-align="left">I had to rewrite this last paragraph several times, but, well, I hope this does not come across the wrong way...<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">it can certainly not continue like this, so ... why not interview him, honestly and with open outcome, how should the collaboration and communication in OSM happen in the future from his point of view? Would he rather feel relieved or rather feel betrayed if the gatekeeping (~deployment) is done by other people? Does he really feel alienated (because I assumed it) from the community and if yes, why? And most importantly, what would it take to reverse this?<br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">+1, though it would be tricky to find someone both interested in doing this, with time to do that,<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">and not already involved in a poor way<br></div> </body>
</html>