<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">23 May 2019, 01:15 by tagging@openstreetmap.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div style="16px" text-align="left"> I find it strange/worrying he makes these far reaching decisions
unilaterally<br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">Note that JOSM also is doing this but in cases of unwanted or broken validation<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">it gets fixed/changed/rolled back.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">I think that main difference between JOSM validation (that is not causing repeated complaints, <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">at least on this mailing list) and iD validation is that JOSM devs have no trouble <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">with reverting or fixing changes that are not actually wanted (or are better on judging what <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">is wanted by community).<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">I think it is fine to make such changes without checking every single one with wider community, <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">as long as unwanted ones get rolled back.<br></div> </body>
</html>