<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 02.06.2019 um 15:41 schrieb Paul
      Allen:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPy1dOL=vFkHR_A3q3hV9RwKQyU3scixYjqR8JgmBUeBK1dPCQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div dir="ltr">On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 at 14:17, Simon Poole <<a
            href="mailto:simon@poole.ch" moz-do-not-send="true">simon@poole.ch</a>>
          wrote:</div>
        <div dir="ltr"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_quote">
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
            0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
            rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
            <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
              <div class="gmail-m_-8228206592145944437moz-cite-prefix">Am
                02.06.2019 um 14:40 schrieb Paul Allen:<br>
              </div>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <div dir="ltr"><br>
                  <div class="gmail_quote">
                    <div>As I already said, I understand your
                      frustration.  </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <p>No, obviously you don't.</p>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Really?  You looked inside my head and determined that I
            do not understand your frustration.</div>
          <div>And here I was thinking that I merely disagreed with your
            proposed solution.  That just goes to</div>
          <div>show how stupid I am, right?<br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
            0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
            rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
            <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
              <p>There is just no way the community can handle a dozen
                or more proposals per month in any reasonable fashion,</p>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div>That's an interesting assertion.  I'm not convinced the
            evidence backs it up, but I'll assume</div>
          <div>(for the sake of argument) that you're right.  So now
            what?  We refuse to deal with the 13th</div>
          <div>proposal in a month so the proposer invents an
            ill-conceived tag and uses it.  Until and</div>
          <div>unless you can put a mechanism in place that prevents
            people inventing tags and using</div>
          <div>them without discussing them on the list first, this is
            not a good idea.  Hint: I use `12 of my</div>
          <div>30 posts/month proposing whimsical tags, so that the tag
            I really want to use is not</div>
          <div>subject to discussion so I'm free to use it anyway.<br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>As Frederik has already pointed out, a proposal and the perhaps
      the following "stamp of approval" is not necessary for using a
      tag, some documentation would be nice but not required. So nothing
      in my suggestion limits which tags can be used, it just rate
      limits the influx of proposals that actually want attention, so
      they can actually get it. <br>
    </p>
    <p>Simon<br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPy1dOL=vFkHR_A3q3hV9RwKQyU3scixYjqR8JgmBUeBK1dPCQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_quote">
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
            0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
            rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
            <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
              <p> essentially it is just gaming the system in another
                way than wikifiddiling.</p>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div>It appears you believe people are deliberately making
            proposals to game the system.  I'm</div>
          <div>far from convinced that is the case.  But if you're right
            about people acting in bad faith, I'd</div>
          <div>already thought of two ways people can game your proposal
            before you replied to me, and I</div>
          <div>wasn't even putting any effort into trying to find flaws
            like that.  Your proposal won't stop people</div>
          <div>gaming the system (if anybody actually is gaming the
            system), it will just change the tactics.<br>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_quote"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_quote">-- <br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_quote">Paul</div>
        <div class="gmail_quote"><br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>