<div dir="auto"><div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, 18:44 Volker Schmidt, <<a href="mailto:voschix@gmail.com">voschix@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">highway=path<br>wheelchair=designated<br></blockquote><div>This would only be correct if this path is mainly or exclusively for wheelchair users. <br></div><div>I presume thet the majority of hiking routes for wheelchair users do not exclude other users, they are likely to be shared with pedestrians, possibly also cyclists.</div></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><span style="font-family:sans-serif">*=designated may ban other means of transport </span><span style="font-family:sans-serif">(depending on the jurisdiction)</span><span style="font-family:sans-serif"> when used with legal access keys. But</span><span style="font-family:sans-serif"> as i understand it, the wheelchair key isn't a *legal* access key like vehicle, bicycle or foot, but indicates *possible* access. Therefore, wheelchair=designates shouldn't be a problem, but i have to admit that it's imperfect.</span></div><div dir="auto"><span style="font-family:sans-serif"><br></span></div><div dir="auto"><span style="font-family:sans-serif">Thus, contrary to what i wrote before, for wheelchair routes, route=wheelchair on the relation and wheelchair=yes on the paths seems better.</span></div></div>