<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 19/06/19 18:24, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:Lhipc2N--3-1@tutanota.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div style="16px" text-align="left">Is there some reason to prefer
one of this two keys for tagging whatever ferry is a paid one?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
What do the cross channel ferries have for UK to France? <br>
<br>
Ha. They don't have a tag on them to indicate that payment is
required. <br>
Not done on UK to Spain either...<br>
Not for England to Isle of Man<br>
Not for the Orkney ferries either<br>
<br>
Toll for England to Ireland <br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:Lhipc2N--3-1@tutanota.com">
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">I feel that toll tag is better
as it is part of road structure. <br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
The wiki says either toll or fee. So use what you like. <br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:Lhipc2N--3-1@tutanota.com">
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">For recreational cruises fee
may fit better but tagging it as route=ferry is<br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">tagging for renderer anyway.<br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">As far as popularity in data
goes - both tags have at this moment basically the same
popularity.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>